EDUCATIONAL ROBOTICS AND ITS ROLE IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66104/hqyj2b11Keywords:
educational robotics; active learning; computational thinking; digital competencies.Abstract
This study focuses on educational robotics within the school context, addressing the need to understand how its integration into pedagogical practices contributes to student development in a society increasingly shaped by digital technologies. The guiding research question investigates how educational robotics can be incorporated into teaching in order to promote the development of cognitive, scientific, and social competencies. The main objective is to analyze the role of educational robotics in structuring teaching processes and fostering students’ comprehensive development. The theoretical framework is grounded in conceptions that view learning as an active process, in curricular integration through the STEM approach, and in the development of computational thinking as a structuring skill. The methodology consists of an integrative literature review, involving the selection and analysis of relevant studies from recognized scientific databases. The findings indicate that educational robotics supports learning through experimentation, contributes to the development of logical reasoning and scientific literacy, and promotes competencies such as collaboration, creativity, and problem-solving. It is concluded that its effectiveness depends on pedagogical mediation, curricular organization, and teacher training, establishing it as a consistent strategy for improving teaching quality. As an implication, the study highlights its relevance for consolidating educational practices aligned with technological and formative demands of contemporary society.
Downloads
References
BENITTI, Fabiane Barreto Vavassori. Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Computers & Education, Amsterdam, v. 58, n. 3, p. 978-988, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
BRASIL. Lei nº 14.533, de 11 de janeiro de 2023. Institui a Política Nacional de Educação Digital e altera as Leis nº 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996, nº 9.448, de 14 de março de 1997, nº 10.260, de 12 de julho de 2001, e nº 10.753, de 30 de outubro de 2003. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2023/lei/l14533.htm. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasília: MEC, 2018. Disponível em: http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/images/BNCC_EI_EF_110518_versaofinal_site.pdf. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026.
BREINER, Jonathan M.; HARKNESS, Shelly Sheats; JOHNSON, Carla C.; KOEHLER, Catherine M. What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, Hoboken, v. 112, n. 1, p. 3-11, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
EGUCHI, Amy. Why robotics in education? Robotics as a learning tool for educational revolution. In: SEARSON, M.; OCHOA, M. (ed.). Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (SITE 2014), 2014, Jacksonville. Proceedings […]. Waynesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2014. p. 94-95. Disponível em: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/130717/. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026.
FEITOZA, Péricles Andrade; CUNHA, Mônica Ximenes Carneiro da. Uso da robótica como ferramenta pedagógica para ensino do pensamento computacional a alunos do ensino fundamental I: um relato de experiência. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE INFORMÁTICA NA EDUCAÇÃO (SBIE), 35., 2024, Rio de Janeiro. Anais […]. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 2024. p. 2273-2286. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbie.2024.242346. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbie.2024.242346
MARTINEZ, Sylvia Libow; STAGER, Gary. Invent to learn: making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. 2. ed. Torrance: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press, 2019.
NUNES, T. F. B. et al. Perspectives of robotics as a pedagogical resource applied to education 4.0: a bibliometric analysis on educational robotics. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. e6310413889, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i4.13889. Disponível em: https://rsdjournal.org/rsd/article/view/13889. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026.
OECD. Education at a glance 2022: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/3197152b-en. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/3197152b-en
ONU. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, 2015. Disponível em: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026.
PAPERT, Seymour. Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Revised ed. New York: Basic Books, 2020.
SARTORELLO, Lorena Barbosa Rodrigues. A robótica educacional nos anos iniciais e o desenvolvimento do pensamento computacional. Uberlândia: Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 2023. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 2023. DOI: http://doi.org/10.14393/ufu.te.2023.8077. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufu.br/bitstream/123456789/40933/1/RoboticaEducacionalAnos%20%281%29.pdf. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026.
SILVA, Heitor Felipe da. Robótica educacional como recurso pedagógico fomentador do letramento científico de alunos da rede pública de ensino na cidade do Recife. 2018. 128 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação Matemática e Tecnológica) – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, 2018. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/32680. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026.
SILVA, S. M. de O. et al. Robótica educacional e competências do século XXI. Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, [S. l.], v. 17, n. 4, p. e8041, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv17n4-081. Disponível em: https://ojs.cuadernoseducacion.com/ojs/index.php/ced/article/view/8041. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv17n4-081
TRILLING, Bernie; FADEL, Charles. 21st century skills: learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
UNESCO. Currículos de inteligência artificial para a educação básica: um mapeamento de currículos de IA aprovados pelos governos. Paris: UNESCO, 2022. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380602_por. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026.
WING, Jeannette M. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, New York, v. 49, n. 3, p. 33-35, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 RJNM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
