EFICÁCIA PROBATÓRIA DE CONVERSAS PELO WHATSAPP NO PROCESSO TRABALHISTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61164/rjnm.v6i1.1965Keywords:
WHATSAPP, ATANOTARIAL, PROCESSO TRABALHISTA, PROVA DOCUMENTAL, PROVA JUDICIAL, DIREITO PROCESSUAL, DIREITO TRABALHISTAAbstract
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the use of WhatsApp messages as evidence in labor lawsuits and their various interests, and whether such evidence is competent in court, given that in some cases, it is the essential and necessary criterion to prove the right of the requesting party.
To this end, this article presents a bibliographical compilation and study of the jurisprudential positioning of the courts on the relevant topic, divided into three preeminent affairs. Initially, it will address digitalized law in the information era, delving deeper into the usage of WhatsApp as the leading means of digital communication today. The second topic deals with definitions, principles, and classifications of evidence in labor lawsuits. Finally, the third topic analyzes the usage of conversations made via the WhatsApp app in labor lawsuits, demonstrating precedents in whether these conversations are indicated to form part of the evidentiary list of grievances.
Keywords: WhatsApp. Court Evidence. Court Proceeding. Labor Lawsuits. Notarial Acts.
Downloads
References
ABOUT end-to-end encryption | WhatsApp Help Center. Disponível em: https://faq.whatsapp.com/820124435853543/. Acesso em: 31 out. 2023.
BERNADES, Felipe. Manual de processo do trabalho. São Paulo: Editora Juspodivm, 2022
BRASIL. Decreto-Lei nº 5.452, de 1 de maio de 1943. Aprova a Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho. [S. l.], 1 maio 1943. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del5452.htm. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2023.
BRASIL. Lei nº 11.419, de 19 de dezembro de 2006. Dispõe sobre a informatização do processo judicial; altera a Lei nº 5.869, de 11 de janeiro de 1973 – Código de Processo Civil; e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF. 19 dez 2006. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11419.htm. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2023.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. Código de Processo Civil. Brasília, DF, 16 mar. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2023.
COSSETTI, Melissa. Quem criou o WhatsApp? – Tecnoblog. 2019. Disponível em: https://tecnoblog.net/responde/quem-criou-o-whatsapp/. Acesso em: 31 out. 2023.
GLOBO, G1. Facebook finaliza aquisição do Whatsapp por US$ 22 bilhões. 7 out. 2014. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/economia/negocios/noticia/2014/10/preco-de-compra-do-whatsapp-pelo-facebook-sobe-us-22-bilhoes.html. Acesso em: 6 nov. 2023.
LEITE, Carlos Henrique Bezerra. Curso de direito processual do trabalho. Saraiva Educação SA, 2021.
LOPES, Alan Moreira. Direito digital: teoria e prática. 1. ed. - São Paulo: Tirant Io Blanch, 2021.
MOTTA, Debora. Admissibilidade da quebra do sigilo do WhatsApp na investigação criminal: à luz do princípio da privacidade. Revista da ESMESC, v. 26, n. 32, p. 113-136, 16 dez. 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.14295/revistadaesmesc.v26i32.p113. Acesso em: 31 out. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/revistadaesmesc.v26i32.p113
FACEBOOK compra app de mensagens instantâneas WhatsApp por 19 bilhões de dólares. 19 fev. 2014. Disponível em: https://veja.abril.com.br/tecnologia/facebook-compra-app-de-mensagens-instantaneas-whatsapp-por-19-bilhoes-de-dolares. Acesso em: 31 out. 2023.
LOPES, André. WhatsApp ganha nova central de segurança para proteção de contas dos usuários | Exame. 31 maio 2023. Disponível em: https://exame.com/tecnologia/examelab/whatsapp-ganha-nova-central-de-seguranca-para-usuarios/. Acesso em: 31 out. 2023.
MARTINS, Sergio Pinto. Direito processual do trabalho – 45. Ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2023.
PAMPLONA Filho, Rodolfo; SOUZA, Tercio Roberto Peixoto. Curso de direito processual do trabalho – 2. ed. – São Paulo: Saraiva Educação, 2020.
PIMENTEL, José Eduardo de Souza. Introdução ao direito digital. Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo, 13(1), 16-39. 17 set. 2018. Disponível em: https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/352. Acesso em: 31 out. 2023.
TEIXEIRA. Tarcísio. Direito Digital e Processo Eletrônico. 5 ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2020.
THEODORO JÚNIOR, Humberto. Código de processo civil anotado. – 22. ed. – Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2019.
WHATSAPP INC. WhatsApp, 2023. Sobre o WhatsApp. Disponível em:
https://www.whatsapp.com/about/?lang=pt_br. Acesso em: 06 de nov.2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica do Nordeste Mineiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits the sharing of the work with proper acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., posting in an institutional repository or publishing it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and initial publication in this journal are properly acknowledged, and that the work is adapted to the template of the respective repository;
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive exchanges and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access);
Authors are responsible for correctly providing their personal information, including name, keywords, abstracts, and other relevant data, thereby defining how they wish to be cited. The journal’s editorial board is not responsible for any errors or inconsistencies in these records.
PRIVACY POLICY
The names and email addresses provided to this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes of this publication and will not be made available for any other purpose or to third parties.
Note: All content of the work is the sole responsibility of the author and the advisor.
